The Ohio State University's Christopher M Fairman has published a scholarly paper called "Fuck":
This Article is as simple and provocative as its title suggests: it explores the legal implications of the word fuck. The intersection of the word fuck and the law is examined in four major areas: First Amendment, broadcast regulation, sexual harassment, and education. The legal implications from the use of fuck vary greatly with the context. To fully understand the legal power of fuck, the nonlegal sources of its power are tapped. Drawing upon the research of etymologists, linguists, lexicographers, psychoanalysts, and other social scientists, the visceral reaction to fuck can be explained by cultural taboo. Fuck is a taboo word. The taboo is so strong that it compels many to engage in self-censorship. This process of silence then enables small segments of the population to manipulate our rights under the guise of reflecting a greater community. Taboo is then institutionalized through law, yet at the same time is in tension with other identifiable legal rights. Understanding this relationship between law and taboo ultimately yields fuck jurisprudence.
近日，美国俄亥俄州立大学的克里斯托弗· 爱姆·费尔曼发表了一篇关于“Fuck”的论文，以下是论文摘要：
本文是就标题进行的简单而不乏挑衅的建议：它研究的是单词“Fuck”的合法含义。我们主要从以下四个方面审视了Fuck的词义集合及其规律：第一处修改，传播规则、性骚扰和教育。Fuck的合法含义在上下文关联中进行了很大的修改。为了完全理解Fuck的合法性，就得把其非法部分抽出来。根据语源学、语言学家、词典编撰者、心理分析学者和其他社会科学学者的研究，Fuck的内在涵义可解释为文化禁忌。Fuck是一个禁忌词语。其强大的禁忌力量迫使大家在使用时进行自我审查。这个无声的过程为一小戳人在一个伪装起来的社会中操纵我们的权利提供了方便。接下来，禁忌通过法律习俗化和制度化，同时又跟其他明确的合法权利发生了冲突。了解法律和禁忌之间的关系将最终催生Fuck法理学。
全文下载：点
（本文图片由四爷友情赞助）
Trackback: http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=897182