<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>然而不然</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/</link><description>王少磊的博客</description><dc:language>zh-CHS</dc:language><generator>.Text Version 1.0.1.0</generator><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>必须跟蚂蚱不一样——仙林茶苑沙龙接受采访</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/05/15/1291366.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/05/15/1291366.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1291366.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/05/15/1291366.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1291366.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1291366</trackback:ping><description>我很不喜欢“浪漫”，这个词一身的香粉，浸满消费社会的虚假。沙龙，偏一点就变得恶俗可笑。这点我非常警惕敏感。钱锺书的小说《猫》，有人说就是影射林徽因的客厅。在那里，我是说在主人公爱默那里，客厅不是文学的公共空间，而是知识分子争风吃醋、咬文嚼字的地方。
&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1291366.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>必须跟蚂蚱不一样——仙林茶苑沙龙接受采访</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/05/15/1291367.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/05/15/1291367.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1291367.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/05/15/1291367.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1291367.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1291367</trackback:ping><description>我很不喜欢“浪漫”，这个词一身的香粉，浸满消费社会的虚假。沙龙，偏一点就变得恶俗可笑。这点我非常警惕敏感。钱锺书的小说《猫》，有人说就是影射林徽因的客厅。在那里，我是说在主人公爱默那里，客厅不是文学的公共空间，而是知识分子争风吃醋、咬文嚼字的地方。
&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1291367.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>大林给我的牛掰搜索 </title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/05/03/1285679.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 11:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/05/03/1285679.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1285679.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/05/03/1285679.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1285679.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1285679</trackback:ping><description>那么，世界上是否有“互联网传播学”呢？一想到这个问题立即出了身冷汗。
&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1285679.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>戏剧作业之八：易卜生的反佳构以及真古典 </title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/16/1253225.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/16/1253225.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1253225.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/16/1253225.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1253225.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1253225</trackback:ping><description>我们不是为了衬托李玉和，把王连举刻画得贼眉鼠目吗？然后，再在以后的创作中反对高大全。《亮剑》之所以能火，很大程度上在于老李会说：他妈的……，&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1253225.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>诸君赶快来买，兄弟等米下锅</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/10/1252082.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/10/1252082.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1252082.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/10/1252082.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>13</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1252082.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1252082</trackback:ping><description>先前已说过，今年这个小书，是民营朋友的本钱，所以我希望它卖出一点，作者不至于太难看，东家也赔得少点。&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1252082.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>岁除意识流：卸载MSN，为意气风发地推进全面建设小康创造更加美好的未来而奋斗</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/08/1251875.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/08/1251875.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1251875.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/08/1251875.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>11</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1251875.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1251875</trackback:ping><description>刘小姐哭了半个晚上，刘小姐没吃早饭没吃午饭，刘小姐一个人在河边走来走去，刘小姐晚饭回来吃吃了两碗。&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1251875.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>戏剧作业之七：应该总结而非规定创作规律 </title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/03/1251190.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/03/1251190.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1251190.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/03/1251190.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1251190.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1251190</trackback:ping><description>也许有时候积重难返，需要抬先贤以为策略？就好比康有为维新，却仍要迂回述旧，努力证明改制乃儒学传统（《孔子改制考》）。但我们为什么，一定要据此假定孔子永远正确——在全部的方面？

&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1251190.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>戏剧作业之六：玩句子谁比过马克思 </title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/01/1250662.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/01/1250662.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1250662.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/02/01/1250662.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1250662.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1250662</trackback:ping><description>岂止是悲喜。粗糙比平滑有力量，颠覆比粉饰有力量，疼比痒有力量，咖啡比糖有力量。

&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1250662.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>我的同学朱文娜——年终忆旧2 </title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/30/1250142.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/30/1250142.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1250142.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/30/1250142.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1250142.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1250142</trackback:ping><description>同学，特别之处，在于共同的回忆场景，且在最美好、最忧伤的那段日子。此后各自栖居，各自沉浮，偶通音讯，彼此唏嘘。我没有想到，又一次聚会到来之前，竟以这种方式获得近况。短信里的问候，再重复一次：不须在意，千万小心。放眼未来，永远支持。 &lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1250142.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>戏剧作业之五：戏剧非数学谁都别发明万能公式 </title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/25/1249044.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/25/1249044.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1249044.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/25/1249044.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1249044.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1249044</trackback:ping><description>《水浒传》和《荡寇志》立场相异，但他们其实，它们都有可能成为一部好小说的（当然后者没有）。在这个层面上，我倒是觉得黑格尔所说并不真的是“困窘之处”。
&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1249044.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>戏剧作业之四：我不相信“恐惧”带来的道德震慑 </title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/23/1248470.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/23/1248470.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1248470.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/23/1248470.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1248470.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1248470</trackback:ping><description>换言之，我不相信，“恐惧”带来的道德震慑，尤其是在今天的中国，会成为一种事实。比如老戏迷纵然为秦香莲流泪，那断非生活中的悲痛或悲恸。后者是真的痛苦，前者庶几可算是另类的享受。但我不相信，陈世美的结局，有助于他在家庭关系中采取明智立场。

&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1248470.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>戏剧作业之三：构成讨论基础的那些概念</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/20/1247709.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/20/1247709.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1247709.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/20/1247709.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1247709.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1247709</trackback:ping><description>就好比我说：一个好的小说，应该是情节和文辞俱佳的（这是我的审美标准），但我总不能说，坏的小说不是小说，既然它也塑造人物，讲故事、有情节叙述有环境描写。&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1247709.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>我学生拍的大片《戒色》 </title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/16/1246805.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/16/1246805.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1246805.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/16/1246805.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1246805.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1246805</trackback:ping><description>我惟一的意见是：没有让我在剧中，出演哪怕是路人乙的角色。我一直想在课后加入你们，正好比当初，我一直想让你们在课堂上加入我。&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1246805.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>跟他们胡扯</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/10/1244895.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/10/1244895.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1244895.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/10/1244895.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1244895.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1244895</trackback:ping><description>倒是叶京有一点意思了，比如《与青春有关的日子》——但真在电视台播会剪成什么样子？&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1244895.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>shaoleiwang</dc:creator><title>戏剧作业之二：给悲剧的定义以及给柏拉图的鸡 </title><link>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/06/1243623.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/06/1243623.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/1243623.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/archive/2008/01/06/1243623.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/comments/commentRss/1243623.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1243623</trackback:ping><description>（不过，我倒是记得他给柏拉图送过一只鸡，褪过毛的，用以反对老师关于“人”的定义）。 &lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/shaoleiwang/aggbug/1243623.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>