http://blog.donews.com/zyc/History of Chinese Language zh-CHS.Text Version 1.0.1.0张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/20/176974.aspxSat, 20 Nov 2004 21:39:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/20/176974.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/176974.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/20/176974.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/176974.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=176974提要 1945年日本投降，光复时的台湾，语言使用情况十分混乱。1946年4月台湾省国语推行委员会成立，领导推行国语的工作，作了卓有成效的努力。所编订的《国音标准汇编》作为地方政府的法令公布，是这一具有历史意义的推广汉语通语运动的最重要的“物质遗产”，是中国语言学史上的珍贵文献。本文介绍台湾光复初期国语推行运动的简况，叙述《国音标准汇编》的内容梗概，以及魏建功先生等对国语运动的杰出贡献。不忘往史，缅怀先贤是本文的旨趣。考虑到若干文献或在大陆或在台湾都不经见，故本文对史料多直接征引。本文并对若干历史记载，或考订，或存疑。 关键词 台湾 国语 国语运动 国音标准汇编 魏建功 俞敏<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/176974.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/158203.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 14:21:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/158203.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/158203.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/158203.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/158203.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=158203<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/158203.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157709.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 03:40:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157709.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157709.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157709.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157709.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157709<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157709.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157708.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 03:39:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157708.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157708.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157708.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157708.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157708<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157708.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157707.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 03:38:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157707.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157707.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157707.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157707.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157707<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157707.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157704.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 03:34:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157704.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157704.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157704.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157704.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157704<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157704.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157697.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 03:31:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157697.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157697.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157697.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157697.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157697<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157697.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157695.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 03:29:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157695.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157695.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157695.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157695.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157695<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157695.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157693.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 03:25:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157693.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157693.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157693.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157693.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157693<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157693.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157680.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 02:37:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157680.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157680.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157680.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157680.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157680<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157680.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157672.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 02:00:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157672.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157672.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157672.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157672.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157672音韵学的经典名文《颜氏家训·音辞篇》论及当时的南语、北语：“南染吴越，北杂夷虏，皆有深弊，不可具论。”此实一篇之精髓，是关乎中国语言史和汉语方言史的头等重要的论题，惜乎在昔学人累千载而不悟，本文揭明并命名为“颜之推谜题”并加以论证。 本文自创下列语言学专门术语：“颜之推谜题”、“语言入侵”、“主态语言”、“文史语言学”。 <img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157672.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157671.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 01:53:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157671.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157671.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157671.aspx#Feedback1http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157671.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157671<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157671.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157653.aspxMon, 01 Nov 2004 01:31:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157653.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/157653.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/11/01/157653.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/157653.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=157653在过去的汉语史的分期中,魏晋南北朝的地位很暧昧,有的学者 把它和唐五代甚或宋代合并为中古汉语,有的学者把它归入近代汉 语,有的学者把它归入古代汉语.本文以先秦汉语及近,现代汉语的 语法特徵为参考点来考较不同时段的异同,指出东汉和魏晋南北朝没 有分属两期的必要,同时也指出在东汉魏晋南北朝时,先秦汉语的重 要语法特徵几乎都已不复存在,而且部分近代汉语的语法特徵在其时 也已出现.总之就语法特徵而言,东汉魏晋南北朝和先秦汉语差距相 当大,但与近代汉语复有出入,可以说差不多位於先秦汉语和近代汉 语间的中点,因此我们认为有理由把东汉魏晋南北朝分离出来独立为 中古一期,而与上古汉语和近代汉语鼎足而立. <img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/157653.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/10/25/148686.aspxMon, 25 Oct 2004 18:51:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/10/25/148686.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/148686.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/10/25/148686.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/148686.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=148686<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/148686.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />张延成http://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/10/24/147250.aspxSun, 24 Oct 2004 18:59:00 GMThttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/10/24/147250.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/147250.aspxhttp://blog.donews.com/zyc/archive/2004/10/24/147250.aspx#Feedback0http://blog.donews.com/zyc/comments/commentRss/147250.aspxhttp://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=147250<img src ="http://blog.donews.com/zyc/aggbug/147250.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />